Saturday, June 2, 2012

This Says Everything You Need To Know About The Left

Today on HuffPost was an article about the upcoming recall election in Wisconsin.

One person commented as follows:

HUFFPOST SUPER USER

miss sandy .517 Fans
"I hope the good people of Wisconsin come out in droves to take their state back. If they fail, every Republican governor in this country will do the same thing to their states that Walker has done to Wisconsin. We, the American people cannot allow that. "

Now here's the meat of this - since Walker was elected, unemployment is DOWN. The budget is beginning to balance for the first time in awhile. Things are actually looking up, as businesses are now moving to Wisconsin because of the changes Walker has made.

But that doesn't faze the left - oh, no! As Miss Sandy said, "We, the American people cannot allow" other Republican governors in other states to do the same thing - making things better. After all, if Republicans succeed in making things better, it could be a very long time before the left gets elected to anything higher than Animal Control Officer.

/

A Pattern of Lawlessness

In April, a 26 year old woman named Cruz was evicted from her home in Minneapolis for failing to pay for the home.

Most people realize that if you can't pay for something, you lose it, as well you should. After all, you can't go around collecting stuff and expecting to keep it for free. Of course, the "gimmee" people think that is how things should be - they should be able to have what everyone else has, and if they can't afford it they should get it free. But if that were the case, most businesses would go bankrupt - without getting paid for their products, they go belly up. Then no one will have anything.

Anyway...

Ms Cruz had come here as an illegal immigrant, from Mexico City. And a pattern of lawlessness begins - apparently her family had no respect for America's laws.

She goes on to "fight" for the DREAM act, which would bestow citizenship rights to most illegals. Again, we have a mindset that people should get a free ride as if it were a birthright.

Just prior to eviction, Cruz invited many of her activist friends to live in the house with her, in an attempt to thwart the eviction and to stand up for her "right" to stay in the home she was not paying for. More disregard for the law.

In April, Cruz left. But since then Occupy protesters have been staying at the house, trying to keep police from vacating it. As protesters are arrested, more move in.

It seems the Occupy folks also have no regard for the law OR for the property of others.

There is a pattern of lawlessness among those on the far left - Occupiers, illegals, drug users etc. In each case, these people have zero respect for anyone or anything. Their only objective in life is to live without the restrictions that come with laws. Society makes laws for the express purpose of protecting rights. But those on the far left care nothing about the rights of others - only about the rights they think THEY are entitled to. THEY have a right to protest YOU, but they do not believe YOU have the right to protest them. THEY have a right to a free ride, but YOU don't - YOU are the one they feel should be paying for their free ride.

Their disrespect of people, property and laws are the core of these people. They are selfish whiners who are absolutely useless to any civilized society. And we will all be better off if authorities finally begin to enforce the laws and crack down on the pattern of lawlessness that these people perpetuate.

/

Friday, May 25, 2012

The Great Unemployment Lie

Just a brief side note of interest...

Every week the administration puts out the latest unemployment figures. And every week for 63 of the last 64 weeks the figures were bogus, and were quietly "adjusted" a week later. The result? The administration could say, "It's improving!", when in fact, it was not. They would toot the horn of success loudly when the bogus numbers were released, but when they got adjusted a week later, it was quiet and without fanfare.

Most people have no idea that the unemployment figures claimed to be lower than they really were for 63 of the last 64 weeks. But now YOU know...

/

Perspective - Something Washington Lacks?

Let's see if I have this straight...

* GSA blows over $800,000 on an "over-the-top" party for themselves in Vegas

* The 9th Circuit Court of Appeals (those libs on the West Coast) plan to blow a million bucks on a party for themselves in Hawaii

* $60 BILLION is wasted EACH YEAR on Medicare fraud

* $40 billion in other obvious waste and redundant costs have been discovered, but nothing done to stop them

*Solyndra blew $500 million of taxpayer money, courtesy of Obama

* Federal employees owe the I.R.S. nearly a billion in back taxes

* Latest study shows $750 million lost in food stamp fraud

I won't bore you with the complete list - it goes on to the tune of half a trillion dollars. So that would beg the question...

"Why do the Democrats say we need to raise taxes, since the increase in taxes on "the rich" would only bring in a fraction of what is already being wasted?"

Here's an idea - cut out the waste and fraud and we could CUT taxes for EVERYONE.

No, we do not need to raise taxes - the only purpose of that would be so crooks can steal even more.

/

The Latest Distortion of the Truth

Mitt Romney has been mildly slamming President Obama for his wild spending, claiming Obama has spent more taxpayer money, faster than any other president.

Yesterday President Obama fired back, claiming that government spending is as low as it has been in 60 years.

Here are the facts:

1) CURRENTLY, right now, this year, government spending IS lower than it has been in 60 years, running at about 1%

2) BUT, over the previous 2 years of the Obama administration, spending was HIGHER than ever before, running at about 10%.

So, technically President obama is correct in saying that spending IS (currently) at a low, but is distorting the truth by not including ALL the spending he has done during his term in office. If the spending for the last three years is taken into consideration, rather than a momentary snapshot, then Mitt Romney is correct - Obama HAS spent more, faster, than any other president.

For Mr. Obama to claim spending is down is kinda like Usama bin Laden at the moment the Navy Seals broke into his compound. Bin Laden could have correctly said, "Hey, guys, I'm not hurting anyone", because at that moment he was not hurting anyone.

Before you give any credence to anything a liberal says, please note that they play word games, and use words to distort the actual facts. Make sure you are hearing what they are really saying. When Obama says, "We are now spending less," he literally means NOW - this moment. And that distorts the truth and deceives the uninformed listener.

/

Tuesday, May 22, 2012

Why They Don't Compromise

Every time I turn on the news I hear pundits saying the parties in Congress need to compromise. The Democrats say the Republicans won't compromise, and the Republicans say the Democrats won't budge. So what's the real problem?

Those who say there should be compromise are over-simplifying the problem and their ill-conceived solution. This is because a person of principle should never, ever compromise on a principle. Compromise has a place in ironing out details. But never in asking a person to betray their principles.

Example: Let's say one person is religious, another is atheist. One's religion says he must worship God every day, the other says we should not worship ANY day. A compromise would be, "OK, I'll worship on Tuesdays, Thursdays and Sundays only." That "compromise" is absurd - it solves nothing, makes no one happy and forces both to betray their beliefs.

But let's say that both are religious, and the debate is what date we should celebrate Easter. Since that is a detail rather than a principle (no one knows the date of the true Easter), they can compromise and choose a date that both can grudgingly accept.

The problem in Washington is one of opposing principles, not details. Ideally, both parties want the same thing, but bicker over the details. But that is not what we have. We have two diametrically opposed ideologies, just as we did prior to the Civil War. Back then, if the issue had been not whether or not we should have slaves, but rather how they should be treated, there could be compromise. But the issue was one of opposing principles, so compromise was not the answer.

If we want to break the gridlock in DC, the first thing we need to do is decide, as a nation, the direction we want to travel - a government-controlled nanny state, or a government controlled by and for the people. That is a core principle. Only when we consciously decide what kind of country we want can we then take the time to study the candidates for Congress and the White House, and vote not for a party, but for the people who will take us in our chosen direction. THEN we can have compromise on the details of how to get where we want to go.

Compromise is good, as long as it is not principles that are getting compromised. And whether or not the gridlock will cease depends not upon Congress, nor the President. It depends on US, making a choice as to what kind of country we want, and taking the time to become informed, and then vote.

For Thomas Jefferson was absolutely correct when he said, "Every person gets the government they deserve." If people do not keep informed, and research the facts, and act on it, then they do not deserve a government that will serve them as they would wish.

/